1st International Conference of the English Language Center, Ming Chuan University 

1st International Conference of the English Language Center,   

Ming Chuan University 

Call for Abstracts 

The Ming Chuan University English Language Center invites abstract submissions for the 1st International Conference of the English Language Center, Ming Chuan University, to be held on Saturday, May 11, 2024. 

The conference will focus on Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in the language teaching classroom. However, papers on other topics related to English teaching will be considered, including those addressing: 

  • Teaching activities 
  • Teacher training 
  • Problems encountered by teachers in class 
  • Teaching language for specific purposes 
  • Sociolinguistic issues in the classroom 
  • Language and literature in the language teaching classroom 

Interested individuals are requested to submit a 300-word abstract in MS Word format, following the formatting guide of the submitter’s choice. Please send abstracts as file attachments to Dr. Scott Sommers at sommers@mail.mcu.edu.tw, stating your name, institution, and position in the body of your email. 

Upon acceptance, participants should submit a conference paper to be published online in the proceedings of the conference. 

Conference presentations will be 20 minutes followed by 10 minutes of Q&A. 

We look forward to receiving your submissions 

  • Deadline for abstract submission: February 16, 2024 
  • Acceptance notification: March 1, 2024 
  • Submission of conference paper: April 1, 2024 
  • Conference date: May 11, 2024 

Venue 

The conference will be held in Taipei at Ming Chuan University, Jihe Campus (銘傳大學基河校區), room details to be announced. 

Additional Notes 

  • Confirm the receipt of your abstract submissions by including a statement in the email submission instructions. 
  • Guidelines for presentations and room details will be provided upon acceptance. 

Thank you for your interest, and we look forward to an engaging conference. 

Westside vs the World

You’ve almost certainly never heard of Westside Barbell, and are even less likely to know there is a long-awaited video documenting the history of the place. But I’ve been waiting almost a year for this and just paid $12.99 to Vimeo to watch “Westside vs the World.”

Back in the 1970s, before there was MMA, people who wanted street fights knew that most classical martial arts training wouldn’t get you very far. We knew there was stuff like boxing, judo and wrestling, but there was nowhere to transform this into the real fight that we wanted. If you wanted to fight, you generally ended up in a gym doing weights. These were the days that gave birth to Louie Simmons and the Westside Barbell.

Louie Simmons invented a kind of training called the conjugate method. For many years, most of the strongest people in the world trained using this method. And they trained with Louie at Westside. It was the Mecca of powerlifting. This is not bodybuilding or strongman contests. This is powerlifting. The significance of this is that there is no money in powerlifting. None at all, or almost none anyway. Now let’s be straight about this – powerlifting wreaks you. One of the things that the film makes clear is that these guys are wreaked in no time at all. The film talks about damaged knees and heads, but mostly backs, broken discs, a lot of broken discs. Powerlifters die young. Some of the guys in the film are 300 pounds or more. You gotta be that heavy if you’re going to deadlift 1000 pounds. You have to eat all day if you want to be 300 pounds. It costs a lot of money to live this way, especially if your training involves drugs. This kind of lifestyle of eating and lifting just kills people. But people don’t powerlift to become rich.

They powerlift because it satisfies some inner pathology that they have about power. These people are maniacs. They want to be the strongest people in the world, no matter what: even if it’s only for a minute and then it kills you. They will do anything they think will make them stronger. If you watch the film, one of the things that becomes clear very quickly is that there’s not a lot of joy in their lives. When Dave Hoff talks about pushing people over when he competes because he gets so mad, he’s not talking about a happy experience. These guys get in fights with each other while they’re training and they don’t seem to like each other very much. No one seems to like Louie, even though they spend most of their life with him. It seems as though he’s more important to them than their families or friends, and despite giving up his life to them, neither he nor they have anything good to say about each other. It’s as if being nice to people or liking someone is a weakness that you’re not allowed to show. This isn’t a heroic story about overcoming adversity and achieving goals. This is a story about maniacs chasing goals that they don’t even think of as rewarding. It’s a story about a kind of mental masochism. It’s a story about a Faustian pact to give up life as we know it so you can stand underneath a bar that weighs a little bit more than last time.

To be honest, I wasn’t as excited about the final version as I thought I’d be. The trailer looks much better and the hype in the powerlifting community was just crazy. A lot of comments on the purchase site talk about the excitement that the film brought to viewers. Many said they wanted to go out and train after they saw the film. To me, it was a story about unlikable monsters who do things with people they don’t like in a dirty place that they really hate. Louie Simmons himself says in it in the extended trailer, “If you don’t want to die to do this, then you shouldn’t do this…That’s what this gym is, it’s a journey into Hell.” And that’s what this film is about, man and women who journey into Hell.

I have to post another quote that addresses this point, just to show you what kind of people we’re talking here. About halfway through the film, there’s Westside lifter Mark Bell answering a question about how his training methods are dangerous and will damage your body in the long-run. Justifying to us why he goes through all this suffering just to be stronger he says, “We will all die. We will all be in a lot of pain. It’s all comin’ our way. It’s inevitable. It’s a part of life. But in the mean time, you might as well be a fuckin’ savage.” So Bell gives up his life, dies young and in pain because he wants to be a savage. OK. That’s what powerlifting at Westside Barbell is about.

If you’re not at all involved in this world, you’ll miss the significance of the ending. Westside is kind of a story, an ancient myth about the origins of a race of extraordinary people. Really, they’re pretty much gone now. If you watch the film, that’s what they mean about the rise of raw lifting. It’s hard to explain. The film tries to explain this and actually does a pretty good job, but powerlifting competition involves a lot of different events that lift differently and have different rules about how you can compete and score successful lifts. Westside was the giant in a world ruled by what is called “gear”. This is entirely different from “raw” lifting. Personally, I think powerlifting competitions with gear are stupid. Wearing gear can add hundreds of pounds to your lifts, but it’s like sitting on the nose of rocket and then telling people you’re the fastest person in the world. It’s just stupid.

Nobody trains conjugate anymore. If you pay attention to the film, you’ll notice that Louie is training all kinds of other athletes now, like cross-fit, MMA, football players. Conjugate’s probably good for these kinds of sports but it just doesn’t dominate raw powerlifting. There are other clubs and lots of other trainers now who train people using many different methods. And besides, all the big records now are raw. It’s the end of an era.

And I’m kind of glad about this. I’m glad I was able to avoid training at Westside. It’s a really dark place. I can see how it just gets to some people and eats up their lives. They spend their whole existence chasing this goal that they picked when they were 17 or something, sacrificing joy and happiness and feeling nice about life, dying at God-awfully early ages. They became monsters escaped from a portal to Hell. Weightlifting personality Stan Efferding put it best. During all those years that Westside dominated the world, there were people running around saying that the conjugate method couldn’t work and then listing off all kinds of reasons, so Westside must be cheating somehow. But that’s stupid, too. Westside athletes broke more world records in powerlifting than lifters from any other club in the whole world. That’s just a fact. But there are lots of reasons to wonder how they got so strong. Efferding has an answer that I think is a good place to end this.
“I believe the real secret to their success is that they just worked harder. They were in a savage gym with a savage coach, surrounded by savage lifters, and they trained like savages.”

You might want to look at this after reading my post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDHYjZBflfE

And a video that deals with why people would do this kind of thing at such a high price.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6_7rYB43i4

The Statue That’s Supposed to be Designed by Jeffrey Dahmer

I have just discovered a very strange thing. If you read all this conspiracy theory stuff, some of it starts to make sense. That doesn’t mean it’s true. A lot of times things start to make sense because your thinking can be tricked. Despite years and years of training and self-discipline, I still have the same brain as everyone else and even though I think I’m some sort of expert at not getting tricked by this crap, I still get caught.

Sometime between 1987 and 1991, serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer slaughtered young men. Some of these men, he posed in strange positions and photographed. You may know from my previous posts that large numbers of right-wing Americans believe that leading figures in the Democrats and Hollywood are involved in some sort of ritualistic murder. Much of this is said to involve the sexual abuse and murder of children, and perhaps even Satanic or demonic practices.

As proof of this, leading players in this conspiracy theory are often shown with pictures of a statue claimed to be a model of a Jeffrey Dahmer murder victim. Players in this story include Tony Podesta and his wife, as well as Gwyneth Paltrow, who I otherwise detest. All of this along with Jeff Epstein had me wondering, could there really be something to all of these twisted tales of Hollywood Democrats and their Satanic sexual desires? Now remember, this is me talking here.

But then I discovered that this is fact a much older artistic figure designed by French artist Louise Bourgeois displayed in the Museum of Modern Art. This confusion has been blogged about by art experts for years, but the QAnon and Proud Boys people I hang around with have missed this. In fact, it is speculated in some of the links I’ll provide that it is a much older occult symbol or related to medical problems that were common in the 19th century. It’s entirely possible that none of the Democrats involved in this story have any idea about the similarity that every member of QAnon knows about and blogs about or posts on Twitter.

Now you keep in mind, this is me. I read weird stories all the time. I first heard about this last year and it’s taken me all year to figure this out. And I spend all day doing this, almost all the time. You can really see how people who aren’t even stupid could get sucked into thinking about some of the weirdest stuff on this planet.

https://pedogate.world/pedo-art/arch-hysteria/

Another good blog post about this is

How the Republican Party Became a Conspiracy Theory Cult – unfinished

Belief in conspiracy theory is a psychological characteristic. It is a personality characteristic that is found in people and distributed across the population (Swami, 2012; Swami et al, 2011). But describing it this way is not a very useful concept in understanding why it has come to play such an important role in contemporary news. Conspiracy theory is now an organized activity. It is created and circulated by groups of people in organizations. Some of these organizations have religious and political affiliations.

The term ‘Evangelical Christian’ is used to describe a loosely organized group of Christian church leaders and their followers that share a particular view of Christianity. Currently, they compose part of what is referred to as ‘the base’ of the Republican Party and the core of support for current president Donald Trump. Evangelical Christianity is an occult belief system. Such belief systems are inherently conspiratorial in their structure. Since their emergence as a core of support for the Republican Party, Evangelical Christians have driven Republican discourse to increasingly include topics and rhetoric that reflect their belief in an occult universe. It is now impossible for even moderate, secular Republicans to engage with the larger party without reflecting on these beliefs.

The Republicans and Conspiracy Theory

Perhaps the most contentious aspect of my argument is that conspiracy theory is something different for the Republicans than it is for the Democrats. I’m not saying that there are no individual Democrats who accept conspiracy theories or other weird ideas. The difference that I am going to go on to discuss is that the claims of conspiracy theories are institutionalized into the Republican Party and have become part of the fabric of the party. There are many ways that you can see this function. Many Republican candidates use established conspiracy theories as part of their platform. Republican leadership, at the highest level, is informed by conspiracy theory that is organized on an industrial level. It is so deeply entrenched in the party that it is difficult for candidates to develop credibility within the party without making some sort of conspiracy theory claim. Later parts of this paper will elaborate on a more fundamental point about the Republican – that their party only continues to exist because of support from organized conspiracy theory in the form of Evangelical Christianity, but that will come later.

First, I need to address one of the most frequently encountered points with this argument. It is important to realize that conspiracy theory does exist in the Democratic Party. People are people, and some of them believe in all kinds of crazy things. The difference is that these beliefs have never become incorporated into the culture of the Democrats, much less into their policy. Self-proclaimed covens of witches have placed curses on prominent Republican figures (Guardian, 2018; Vox, 2017) throughout this current administration. Prominent Democrat Andrew Sullivan once suggested a conspiracy theory that Sarah Palin was involved in an attempt to cover-up the true parenthood of her son Trigg (Atlantic, 2010). Numerous conspiracy theories have circulated concerning the administration of Republican President George H. W. Bush ranging from President Bush declaring martial law and ceasing control of the country (Daily Kos, 2008) to allegations of massive voting irregularities resulting in the 2004 Democrat defeat (2004 United States election voting controversies). While these ideas were suggested and discussed in the pro-Democrat media, at no point were they platforms of the party. I am unaware of any public demonstrations or candidates advancing these positions as part of their campaign, and when Democratic President Obama was elected in 2008, at no point did he ever mention these conspiracy theories and no investigations of the earlier allegations were conducted. They were simply rumors promoted by individuals that then got circulated through the pro-Democrat media.

One of the clearest examples of conspiracy theory among the Republicans are the bizarre ideas that took shape around President Barack Obama. These conspiracy theories took several different forms. Some of these include him working as a teenage prostitute to supply his drug habit. But the most prominent of these was that President Obama was actually born in Africa, rather than Hawaii, as the official record states. An NBC News poll published in 2016 (NBC, 2016) reported that almost three-quarters of Republicans questioned whether Obama was really born in America and that the belief did not depend on how knowledgeable the Republican was about politics. Even highly knowledgeable Republicans were willing to endorse the idea. Statements about Obama’s birthplace were widespread among Republican candidates. Wikipedia gives a summary list of prominent Republicans expressing this opinion (Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories), but in fact, the list is much longer. I compiled a list (Sommers, undated) of dozens of Republican candidates who made such statements, and it would have been much longer but I got tired of the search. The list includes Mitt Romney, who ironically was not born in the United States (Romney makes a birther joke in Michigan, 2012). Clearly Mr. Romney would not have believed such a ridiculous story, but even a candidate at his level has to pay at least lip service to the important conspiracy theories that are powering the party’s electoral machine.

The idea that Barack Obama was born in Africa was widespread among Republicans during this period. It was repeated by such prominent Republicans as Mike Huckabee, Roy Moore, and Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County in Arizona. Sheriff Joe, as he came to be called, actually conducted his own investigation into the president’s birth certificate and flew to Hawaii to examine the original (USA Today, 2016). Perhaps the most significant proponent of this conspiracy theory was then presidential hopeful Donald Trump. Trump went on to publically state that he was convinced by the evidence that President Obama’s birth certificate was real, but following his 2016 election as POTUS, VOX reported that President Trump was continuing to doubt the authenticity of the document (VOX, 2017).

This has not been President Trump’s only brush with conspiracy theory. Trump is a voracious consumer of conspiracy theory. In 2015, just prior to his election as POTUS, Trump appeared on the broadcast of infamous conspiracy theory guru Alex Jones, where he lauded his work. Although Jones now has stated that he no longer consults with President Trump, Trump has at different points used vocabulary that indicates he was being advised by Alex Jones. For example, in referring to the October 27, 2018 shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, President Trump used the term “false flag” to speculate that the shooting was actually conducted by American Jews seeking public sympathy. The term, however, is widely used in conspiracy theory circles and frequently used by Jones in explaining how government-based operations use the media to blame faultless suspects (Atlantic, 2018). In an interview with podcaster Joe Rogan (2017), Alex Jones claimed that he is able to talk to “heads of state”, implying that he has regular contact with President Trump. Business Insider (2018) states that Donald Trump has endorsed 19 different conspiracy theories, not including the current QAnon conspiracy theory that is circulating through the American right-wing (Time, 2 August, 2018).

It is often stated that belief in some sort of conspiracy theory is widespread in the USA (Psychology Today, 2015). But few people are willing to talk about their belief in public. However, when they do and they run for political office, a large number of them are Republicans. Most recently, in at least five state and national races across the country, the Republican Party is dealing with an uncomfortable problem. Their party’s candidates are either a card-carrying Nazi, a Holocaust denier, a proud white supremacist, or all of the above (VOX, 2018). In fact, Republicans voted for some of them of candidates in large numbers. In Chicago, Holocaust denier Arthur Jones got 25% of the vote (USA Today, 2018). Mother Jones (2018) provides a more comprehensive list of conspiracy theorists that ran on Republican tickets.

A complete list of Republican candidates and officials who have publicly endorsed conspiracy theory of some sort would be long and cumbersome to read. I’ll try to list as many as I can so that it’s clear how prevalent these beliefs are among leading Republicans. Here are some of them, in no particular order. GOP candidate for US Congress, Bill Fawell (US News, 2018). GOP candidate for Connecticut Attorney General Martha Dean (NBC Connecticut, 2013). Republican Mayor of Newton, New Jersey (True Jersey, 2018). The vice chairman of Orange County’s Republican Executive Committee, Louis Marin (Click Orlando, 2018). Niki Sardot, Republican candidate for State Senate in Montana (Montana Post, 2018). Republican candidate for US Congress from Idaho, Michael Snyder (Idaho Statesman, 2017). Republican Paul Nehlen, running for US Congress from Wisconsin (Splinter, 2018). Gerald I. Smith, Jr, Republican Maryland candidate for US Senate (Red Maryland, 2018). A group of 5 GOP candidates and Florida Republican US Congressman Ron DeSantis (Media Matters, 2018). Husband of Arizona GOP Senate candidate Kelli Ward (The Hill, 2018).

The list is noteworthy for its diversity. It spans candidates and officials in a wide range of positions that are geographically diverse and covers a long time span. This should come as no surprise though. The GOP has long had a problem with it attraction to conspiracy theory. US Congressman Ron Paul was very close to conspiracy theory groups. In addition to being the favorite candidate of 9/11 conspiracy theorists, Dr. Paul has long had a strong relationship with the John Birch Society (John Birch Society, 2011; Vision Liberty, 2013a, 2013b). Ron Paul is not alone on this. His son, US Senator from Kentucky Dr. Rand Paul, has been associated with the League of the South (SPLC, 2013). As well as making claims about the truth of conspiracy theories like the North American Union (Buzzfeed, 2015). More recently, Rand Paul appears to be being much more careful about his association with conspiracy theory.

As Obama Birther conspiracy theories dominated the earlier administrations, the Trump Administration has its own grassroots conspiracy theory – QAnon and the Deep State. QAnon has been associated with the Trump Administration since its inception. QAnon luminary Michael Lionel Lebron appears to have personal connects with President Donald Trump (GQ, 2018), as well as being strongly supported by other QAnon figures (Right Wing Watch, 2019). I personally became aware of the QAnon conspiracy theory by talking with members of the now defunct Trump-supporting group, The Proud Boys. Members of the Proud Boys and their so-called “support group” The Proud Girls, told me that Pizzagate was real and that Muslim rape gangs are roaming through the USA. Looking through the Facebook accounts of these people, I found all of them (yes, every one) had links to other conspiracy theory accounts, such as Alex Jones, InfoWars, Prison Planet and even gang stalking Facebook groups (Motherboard, 2016). Some had extensive libraries of photos and images related to 9/11 and other conspiracy theories.

Most recently, you can see the conspiracy ideology of the Republicans in action following the recent pipe bomb attacks on leading Democrat political figures by Cesar Altieri Sayoc. Republicans and right-wing observers went wild speculating that this was really a conspiracy between the Democrats and the FBI to win sympathy for the Democrats (New Republic, 2018). The situation became so bizarre that even conservative pundits such as Erick Erickson, had to step in and criticize conservatives for spreading the rumor (NBC News, 2018).

Science Becomes the Enemy

It wasn’t always this way. The first organized conspiracy theory organizations in the United States revolved around anti-communist hunts and groups like the John Birch Society (Bell, 2017; Lipset, 1955; Trow, 1958), and its founder, Robert Welch, typically supported the Republicans. But the left wing of the 1960s was also filled with conspiracy theory. This is not immediately evident from the research literature, but writings produced by members of the radicalized left show just how similar the conspiracy theory suggestions found in today’s version of the conspiracy right. SDS founder Tom Hayden writes extensively about this in this memoirs. In Hayden (2015), he talks at length about how the revolution of the 1960s was stopped by the targeted and planned assassination of its most effective political leaders. Realizing that some people will see this as conspiracy theory, he coins the term “conspiracy explorer” to reduce the stigma attached with the idea. He then goes on to talk about rumors circulating through the revolutionary group the Weathermen that President Nixon was going to declare martial law and begin imprisoning his opposition in concentration camps. The Weathermen apparently took this concern quite seriously, as they went on to form an underground terrorist organization that planned murders and actually carried out armed robberies and killings. So it is clear that going into the 1970s, there was not this distinction between the left and right with their use of conspiracy theory as a rhetorical and ideological weapon. Belief in conspiracy theory was organized politically with a leadership and membership that acted upon this belief for both the left and the right.

By the 1970s a unified discourse about conspiracy theory was beginning to appear. Groups like the John Birch Society and the Weather Underground focused on cabals of political, military and business elites organizing to control political events and global affairs. Conspiracy theory began to take on a new look. In addition to the idea that history was really being controlled by forces that were sinister and little understood, theories now developed that included scientists and doctors as unseen agents of control. While this was not entirely new (see for example, Water fluoridation controversy) the breadth and scope of these new conspiracy theories became huge.

Despite overwhelming scientific acceptance, debates about the biological evolution of life had been going on since the concept was introduced. The 1970s saw the emergence of Christian activists challenging the use of policy based evolutionary sciences. They began by constructing a body of information that could be used publicly to confront scientific policy. In 1970, creationists in California established the Institute for Creation Research. This was followed by numerous attempts to force public schools to teach that life has not evolved. However, the scientific consensus on evolution is clear and attempts to challenge it have largely failed.

Around the same time, a scientific discourse about climate change was beginning. In 1989, the fossil fuel industry responded to the threat of regulation by forming the Global Climate Coalition and the George C. Marshall Institute. Working with public relations models developed to oppose tobacco regulation, a heavily-funded climate change denial machine was constructed involving a wide range of participants. A discourse created by conservative foundations and think tanks, front groups and astroturfed organizations are feed into an echo chamber of conservative media, politicians and bloggers (Dunlap & McCright, 2011; Dunlap, 2013; Elsasser & Dunlap, 2013) to create the impression that science has yet to reach a consensus on climate change.

By the turn of the century, almost every aspect of science had a conspiracy theory. HIV and AIDS were created by the CIA (Ross et al, 2006) or perhaps didn’t exist at all (Kalichman et al, 2010). Vaccination caused autism (Davidson, 2017) or perhaps was being used to kill people, (Snopes, undated), even being the true source of the disease. The 9/11 attacks were carried out by agents or associates of the US government, using scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to produce a flawed or even fake investigation blaming fire on the collapse of buildings in the World Trade Center complex (World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories). Shadowy forces were involved in the geoengineering of the Earth using a technology referred to as ‘chemtrails’ (Chemtrail conspiracy theory). More recently, we have seen a resurgence of NASA and outer space conspiracy theories (Moon landing conspiracy theories) and the idea that the Earth is not spherical or revolving around the Sun (CBC, 2019).

So the idea of a conspiracy theory is no longer strange. There are conspiracy theories that cover every facet of existence. Nothing in public life is as it seems. Medicine, politics, business and science are all controlled by dark, shadowy figures whose identity is not clear. History is not what we have been taught. At best, history is confusion about what has really been happening in the world. But it is more easily seen as a lie created to confuse us about who really runs the world. It is a story we are told by dark agents whose real motives we can only guess at. Often these forces are assumed to involve the scientists and scholars who create the mainstream opinions that fill textbooks and classroom instruction. They are included among the agents of this conspiracy theory, as are government officials, professional workers, such as professors, physicians, and peace officers who control the security of the state.

Modern Christianity and the Occult

Christianity is an occult religion. A clear definition of the term occult has been elusive (see Staudenmaier, 2009 for a discussion of this) but the term is often used to describe beliefs that there are forces in the universe that are unseen and perhaps even unseeable, beyond science or supernatural. These forces are powerful and shape the universe, even if we can’t always see how they do it. Occult beliefs lend themselves to the idea that history, or even nature, is not what it seems to be. History is teleological in its nature. It is unfolding with a purpose. There are forces and actors involved in this, some of whom might even realize who they are and what role they are playing in the great drama of history. It is a kind of historical revisionism and much historical revisionism is occult (Goodrick-Clarke, 1993).

Not all Christians are occultist. But the Bible does describe the universe in these terms, and this has not gone unnoticed by many Christian writers, and some of these Christians embrace the idea. Beginning back in the 1980s, Christian writers began producing popular books about the End Times. There are vast numbers of these books but leading authors include Hal Lindsey (Hal Lindsey, undated), Tim LaHaye (Tim LaHaye, undated), and a whole slew of writers discussing how a diabolical force called the Anti-Christ is predicted in the Biblical Book of Revelations will establish a political and economic system prior or the return of Christ and his kingdom (see for example, Mary Stewart Relfe, undated)

Contemporary Christian practice overlaps a great deal with the idea of the occult. Surfing through Youtube, you will find many videos about demons and the invisible world of diabolical magic that threatens a good Christian life. I have spoken with American missionaries on Facebook about their belief in witches and witchcraft. They have warned me that my research in to this might expose me to demonic forces that could take over my life. Exorcism is on the rise in America (Mariani, 2018), or so they say. The demonic is taking over our popular culture, including beverages (MONSTER Energy drinks are the work of SATAN!!!, 2014), children’s cartoons (DEMONIC CARTOON AND CHILDREN, 2018), and the abuse of children (Father falsely accused of being a ‘satanic cult pedophilia ring leader’ Victoria Derbyshire, 2015), to name but a few of these instances.

But not all of this is bad news for Christians. There is magic from God that you can use to fight back with and enrich your life. Using principles taught in Prosperity Theology (Prosperity theology, undated), you can use God’s power to accumulate the kind of things, such as wealth and power, that have historically been seen as the rewards for the worship of Satan and his minions. In addition, there are a growing numbers of Christians who tell us that it is possible for you to get instructions about your life directly from God. Using methods that resemble those used by ghost hunters more than 100 years ago, you can get direct help from God in the form of writing and instructions (Book called Jesus Calling – False book ! , 2019). Living prophets walk the Earth telling us new things that God wants from us (New Apostolic Reformation, undated).

So what is this world being described to us by the core supporters of the Republicans? It is an empire of secrets. It is an invisible world. It is inhabited by dark forces aligned with demonic and diabolical entities. They shape history but it is not always clear how they are doing this. The ‘facts’ we are taught in school and in our books are distorted by these forces. The world and all of humanity are being threatened by things that most people have no knowledge of, and among those who have heard the secrets of the real universe, the ideas are ridiculous or ‘unscientific’. It is a world of conspiracy, where the only solid ground that can be found is among others who think like you.

Christians and the Republicans

By now, everything is anti-climactic. Beginning in the 1980s, Christians started to become aware of themselves as a block with political power. They had interests and identified with certain kinds of issues. In the decades that have followed, they have become increasingly politicized, voting for candidates who support their perceived interests.

References

2004 United States election voting controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_United_States_election_voting_controversies

Atlantic (June 28, 2010), Why Does Trig Matter? https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2010/06/why-does-trig-matter/185362/

Atlantic (October 27, 2018), After Pittsburgh, All Eyes Are on Trump Once More https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/trumps-comments-pittsburgh-synagogue-shooting/574177/

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories

Bell, D. (2017). The radical right. Routledge.

Book called Jesus Calling – False book ! (2019). https://www.facebook.com/cpsministry/videos/1247615298720188/

Business Insider (September 13, 2018), 19 outlandish conspiracy theories Donald Trump has floated on the campaign trail and in the White House https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-2016-5

Buzz Feed News (June 24, 2015) Rand Paul In 2007: Trans-Texas Corridor Could Lead To “North American Union,” US-Mexico Currency https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/christophermassie/rand-paul-in-2007-north-american-union

CBC (February 11, 2019) Flat or round? What one author learned about believers of the flat-Earth theory https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-february-11-2019-1.5013849/flat-or-round-what-one-author-learned-about-believers-of-the-flat-earth-theory-1.5013872

Chemtrail conspiracy theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory

Click Orlando (September 14, 2018) Orange County GOP official says he shared Parkland conspiracy theory ‘to stimulate discussion’ https://www.clickorlando.com/news/orange-county-gop-official-says-he-shared-parkland-conspiracy-theory-to-stimulate-discussion

Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1289-1293.

Daily Kos (October 12, 2008), Bush threatened Congress with Martial Law! https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2008/10/12/628819/-

Davidson, M. (2017). Vaccination as a cause of autism—myths and controversies. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 19(4), 403.

DEMONIC CARTOON AND CHILDREN (Sept 1, 2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8yxkIAKuAI

Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Climate change skepticism and denial: An introduction. American behavioral scientist, 57(6), 691-698.

Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, 1, 144-160.

Elsasser, S. W., & Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 754-776.

Evangelicalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelicalism#cite_note-How_Many_Evangelicals_Are_There-6

Father falsely accused of being a ‘satanic cult paedophile ring leader’ Victoria Derbyshire (April 20, 2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5f9N6wmiLQ

Goodrick-Clarke, N. (1993). The occult roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan cults and their influence on Nazi ideology. NYU Press.

GQ (August 25, 2018) No One Knows Why This QAnon Conspiracy Theorist Was in the Oval Office with Trump https://www.gq.com/story/qanon-conspiracy-theorist-oval-office-trump?verso=true

Guardian (2018), Cursed: witches are planning a public hexing of Brett Kavanaugh https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/15/witches-public-hexing-brett-kavanaugh

Hal Lindsey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Lindsey

Hayden, T. (2015). Long Sixties: From 1960 to Barack Obama. Routledge.

Idaho Statesman (October 6, 2017) Idaho congressional candidate pushes Las Vegas shooting conspiracy theories https://www.idahostatesman.com/article177195056.html

John Birch Society (September 28, 2011) Ron Paul’s Keynote Speech at the 50th Anniversary of JBS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdASDHJ2qAc

Kalichman, S. C., Eaton, L., & Cherry, C. (2010). “There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS”: AIDS denialism beliefs among people living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of behavioral medicine, 33(6), 432-440.

Lipset, S. M. (1955). The radical right: A problem for American democracy. British Journal of Sociology, 6(2), 176-209.

Mariani, M., (December, 2018) American Exorcism. Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/catholic-exorcisms-on-the-rise/573943/

Mary Stewart Relfe, https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Mary_Stewart_Relfe

Media Matters (August 30, 2018) Five Republican candidates are administrators for a racist Facebook group that pushes conspiracy theories https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2018/08/30/five-republican-candidates-are-administrators-racist-facebook-group-pushes-conspiracy-theories/221153

MONSTER Energy drinks are the work of SATAN!!!, (Nov 9, 2014). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bntfUA6TmLs

Montana Post (June 20, 2018) Missoula Republican State Senate Candidate Niki Sardot Steeped in Conspiracy Theories https://themontanapost.com/blog/2018/06/20/missoula-republican-state-senate-candidate-niki-sardot-steeped-in-conspiracy-theories/

Moon landing conspiracy theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories

Motherboard (July 22, 2016) The Nightmarish Online World of ‘Gang-Stalking’ https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/aeknya/the-nightmarish-online-world-of-gang-stalking

Mother Jones (December, 2018) White Supremacists Are Out of the Shadows and Running for Office https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/10/white-supremacists-conspiracy-theorists-republican-candidates/

NBC Connecticut (January 17, 2013) Republicans Outraged by Martha Dean’s Sandy Hook Post on Facebook https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/Republicans-Outraged-Sandy-Hook-Newtown-Martha-Dean-Facebook-187359611.html

NBC News, Poll (August 10, 2016) Persistent Partisan Divide Over ‘Birther’ Question https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/poll-persistent-partisan-divide-over-birther-question-n627446

NBC News (October 28, 2018) Erick Erickson calls on conservatives to stop spreading conspiracy theories about pipe bomb suspect https://www.nbcnews.com/card/erick-erickson-calls-conservatives-stop-spreading-conspiracy-theories-about-pipe-n925361

New Apostolic Reformation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Apostolic_Reformation

New Republic (2018) Prominent right-wingers spread false-flag conspiracy theories about bombing attempts https://newrepublic.com/minutes/151876/prominent-right-wingers-spread-false-flag-conspiracy-theories-bombing-attempts

Prosperity theology, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperity_theology

Psychology Today, August 24, 2015) The Surprising Power of Conspiracy Theories https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/socially-relevant/201508/the-surprising-power-conspiracy-theories

Red Maryland (January 30, 2018) Conspiracy Theorist Files for U.S. Senate https://redmaryland.com/2018/01/conspiracy-theorist-files-u-s-senate/

Right Wing Watch (January 30, 2019) Liz Crokin Says She’ll ‘Have to Bow Out’ of QAnon Movement if ‘Mass Arrests Don’t Happen This Year’ http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/liz-crokin-says-shell-have-to-bow-out-of-qanon-movement-if-mass-arrests-dont-happen-this-year/

Rogan, Joe (February 1, 2017) Joe Rogan Experience #911 – Alex Jones & Eddie Bravo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZPCp8SPfOM

Romney makes a birther joke in Michigan (August 24, 2012), https://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/romney-makes-birther-joke-michigan-no-one-ever-165422639.html?fbclid=IwAR0xue8tE5WQ5dZqLEG3FcQ2bKbnLnE56rjVJsarvkH4hBJ8rF2NLfaEAlI

Ross, M. W., Essien, E. J., & Torres, I. (2006). Conspiracy beliefs about the origin of HIV/AIDS in four racial/ethnic groups. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 41(3), 342.

Snopes (undated) Did Bill Gates Admit Vaccinations Are Designed So Governments Can Depopulate the World? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Sommers, Scott, (undated), Republicans Who are Birthers https://www.facebook.com/notes/scott-sommers/republicans-who-are-birthers/10151154286711502/

Southern Poverty Law Center (July 12, 2013) Rand Paul Aide’s Claims Regarding League of the South are Hogwash https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2013/07/12/rand-paul-aide%E2%80%99s-claims-regarding-league-south-are-hogwash

Splinter (February 21, 2018) Wisconsin Congressional Candidate Continues to Peddle Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theories https://splinternews.com/wisconsin-congressional-candidate-continues-to-peddle-a-1823214626

Staudenmaier, P. (2009). Occultism, Race and Politics in German-speaking Europe, 1880—1940: A Survey of the Historical Literature. European History Quarterly, 39(1), 47-70.

Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: the case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280.

Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real‐world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443-463.

The Hill (May 7, 2018) GOP Senate candidate’s husband spreads conspiracy theories online: report https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/395624-gop-senate-candidates-husband-spreads-conspiracy-theories

Tim LaHaye, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_LaHaye

Time (August 2, 2018), Donald Trump Weaponized Conspiracy Theories. QAnon Shows We’re Now in an Arms Race http://time.com/5356443/trump-conspiracy-theories-qanon/

Trow, M. (1958). Small businessmen, political tolerance, and support for McCarthy. American Journal of Sociology, 64(3), 270-281.

True Jersey (June 7, 2018) Mayor was booted after sharing online conspiracy theory. Now he wants to be a freeholder. https://www.nj.com/sussex-county/index.ssf/2018/06/newton_mayor_running_for_sussex_county_freeholder.html

US News (August 9, 2018) Illinois GOP Rebukes Candidate for Conspiracy Theories https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/illinois/articles/2018-08-09/illinois-gop-rebukes-candidate-for-conspiracy-theories

USA Today (December 15, 2016), Sheriff Joe Arpaio renews birther claims about Obama’s birth certificate https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/12/15/sheriff-joe-arpaio-probe-proves-obama-birth-certificate-fake/95500958/

USA Today (November 7, 2018) 56,000 voters in Illinois House district preferred Holocaust denier to moderate Democrat https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/socially-relevant/201508/the-surprising-power-conspiracy-theories

Vision Liberty (August 15, 2013a) Ron Paul on the Importance of the John Birch Society https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD-IFMTfQbY

Vision Liberty (August 3, 2013b) Ron Paul on Larry McDonald, President of the John Birch Society https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94MUDQc1L9c

Vox (Oct 30, 2017), Each month, thousands of witches cast a spell against Donald Trump https://www.vox.com/2017/6/20/15830312/magicresistance-restance-witches-magic-spell-to-bind-donald-trump-mememagic

Vox (November 29, 2017), Trump is still reportedly pushing his racist “birther” conspiracy theory about Obama https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/29/16713664/trump-obama-birth-certificate

Vox (July 9, 2018) Self-described Nazis and white supremacists are running as Republicans across the country. The GOP is terrified. https://www.vox.com/2018/7/9/17525860/nazis-russell-walker-arthur-jones-republicans-illinois-north-carolina-virginia

Water fluoridation controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_controversy

What is evangelical Catholicism? What is an evangelical Catholic? https://www.gotquestions.org/evangelical-Catholicism.html

Who Believes in QAnon?

Tom I printed out the first 31 pages of the study and had a look at them. There’s a lot more data that I didn’t print. Also I looked at this data between classes then on the bus home. I can’t say this was a thorough look, but I think I understand the meaning quite well by now.

First some warnings. The sample size and methodology creates problems for me. The total N = 2,199 which should be fine for this kind of work. But there are so many tables generated from the data that some of them are bound to be the result of the random nature of the sample. It’s like when I performed 392 Pearson correlations on my doctoral dissertation data. About 1 in 5 of them is going to be significant just by chance, so predictions are going to be more important than usual. In this QAnon data there are none. It is exploratory data that’s been analyzed to death. This is compounded by the small size of many of the cells. For some reason I don’t understand, the total N changes throughout the paper. It’s probably explained in the Appendixes, but I didn’t read that far.

I think this is the reason why many of the items are almost identical. Political affiliation questions are asked many different ways, but appear to be just the same question. I suspect this is an internal check for the data. We don’t have access to these results though and it’ll be hard to really know what’s going on with the data without this information.

Despite this, there were very clear trends in the data. I will try to summarize these here.

As you may have noticed, huge numbers of respondents seemed to know nothing about QAnon. This contributed to the small cell sizes of many responses. It also made small numbers of responses seem larger than they otherwise would be. Many of the questions seemed aimed at something different from what we are all interested in – who believes in QAnon. A lot of items were about social media use and perceived ideas about how people learned about QAnon. But since so many people had never heard of it, most of the time, the largest group really was the group with no knowledge at all.

A typical person who reports actual pro-Q attitudes is younger, whiter, more male and more pro-Trump than others. I could spend a lot of time on age and gender, but the biggest issue in this belief seems to be your attitude about President Donald Trump’s performance. I’ll try to sum this up quickly.

p.10 People who think President Donald Trump is doing a great job were far more likely to report their friends are involved in QAnon content.

p.20 The item asks if you hold a favorable or unfavorable opinion of QAnon. Combining the Very Favorable and Somewhat Favorable responses the most positive people were Republican Men, who were more than twice as likely to endorse these responses than the next most supportive group. Democrat men were the most like to report unfavorable opinions.

p.22 At the top of the page there are a whole range of items about perceptions of Donald Trump’s performance. Supporters of Trump are far, far more likely to report that they have Very Favorable and Somewhat Favorable opinions of the President than others. On the other end, those who do not support the President are far more likely to indicate that they have Very Unfavorable and Somewhat Unfavorable opinions about his performance. This is still true further down the page where respondents are asked about the party they supported in 2016 and 2018.

p.32 Respondents are asked how accurate they think the claims made by QAnon are. Belief in accuracy is limited almost completely to Trump supporters. Those who do not support the President indicate that they think QAnon is not true.

On p.32 there is an interesting point that I’d like to raise. People who claim they did NOT vote in either of 2016 or 2012 show somewhat stronger support for the accuracy of QAnon claims. In other research I have done, swing voters from Obama to Trump appear to be far LESS informed about the news than solid voters. I wonder if this is some of the same people.

And once again, I have to caution you about small numbers. Some of these call sizes make me cringe. Some of them contain only 1 person. Sure, if you ask 100 people and you get a response that only happens once, that says something special about the response. It also might say something about the sample. The small cell sizes make it difficult to do measurement modeling such as SEM or even multivariate models like factor analysis. This will be a hard topic to study simply because most people don’t care about it. But the Trump-angle stuck out very strongly. Although this is not a prediction, I am not surprised.

Daring to Do the Unthinkable

I really dislike Steve Bannon. I don’t think he’s a really smart guy. The media has crafted this image of him. It is wrong. Or at least the media’s description is dumb. Because he has excelled at all those things your teachers told you you could do if you worked hard in school, he is labelled as “smart”. He’s as ‘smart’ as the the architects of the Third Reich were. He’s daring, as were the architects of the Third Reich. And that’s what he and Conway have in common. They are simply willing to do what no one else would dare.

A long time ago a good friend of mine talked about why no one in the USA has blown up Congress or the Senate. He stated that it wasn’t because they couldn’t do it, but because no one would think of doing it. That’s the difference between people like Bannon and Conway. They would think of destroying the government and the nation – and they are. They are simply willing to do that thing what no one would have dared doing, no matter how crazy and stupid it may seem.

What I Think about the Dunning & Kruger Effect

The Dunning & Kruger Effect (DKE) asks participants to assign numbers to their abilities or estimate a score they are likely to get, and then compares their estimate with the actual score. The effect is that the difference between the estimated and the actual score is larger for students who score poorly and very well than it is for mid-range scoring students. In the popular version of the effect, it is only mentioned that poorly scoring students have bad estimates of their actual scores. This is supposed to demonstrate that the worse you are, the less likely you are to realize how bad you really are.

There is no such thing as the Dunning & Kruger Effect. It is a statistical effect widely understood among researchers who use rating scales. It is simply not possible to make estimates with the accuracy demanded by the research. As a result, participants at extreme ends of the scale are less likely to be accurate. This is well-known among scientists who work with rating scales – that estimates at the extreme ends of the scale are less accurate. It’s called centrality and is considered a rater bias that occurs naturally. The verbal description of the DKE makes sense. I’d say it’s almost folklore among the educated. But the experimental demonstrations of it developed by K&D have little to do with this verbal description.

Let’s put it this way. We got 100 students and we give them a test. Their scores are distributed normally. Before the test, we ask them

1. What will your score be?

2. Will your score be in the bottom quarter, second quarter, third quarter or top quarter of the class?

3. Will your score be in the bottom third, second third, or the top third of the class?

4. Will your score be in the top half or the bottom half of the class?

5. Will you pass or fail?

In fact, students have no idea what their scores will be. It is rare that anyone can guess their actual score before they take the test, especially the very low scoring ones. Students who score say 20 or 30 on the test will give you an estimate for their score of 40 or 50. There seems to be a low estimate below which students do not estimate their scores as likely to be, no matter how badly they know they will do. But the thing is, they know they’re going to fail. They know they’re in the bottom of the class. The more accurately you ask them to estimate their score, the less correct they are. In my sample, students were 100% correct about whether they would pass or fail. Bad students know who they are. They just have trouble assigning numbers to their predictions. And a greater demand for accuracy makes this even more difficult.

There are many examples of social cognition that are widely cited outside of psychology, by economists and policy scientists and such, that are rarely or never mentioned in social psychology. KDE is one of them. Outside of Kruger, Dunning and their students no one in psychology does work on this. It is widely cited particularly by economists and business theorists.

For a more detailed description of the effect, have a look at this blog post

http://danluu.com/dunning-kruger/

Also, this link will take you to a Google Scholar search for the DKE

https://scholar.google.com.tw/scholar?hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0,5&q=dunning+kruger+effect

Many of these papers are free.

For more research on centrality, see the links listed here,

https://scholar.google.com.tw/scholar?q=centrality+rater&btnG=&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0%2C5

A lot of these papers are quite technical. An accessible paper to introduce the idea of centrality, why it is a natural problem in rating and what it means to measure it is,

Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., & Lahey, M. A. (1980). Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 413-428.

You should be able to download this for free from the Internet.

The Real Conspiracy in Ferguson, Missouri

I’m posting this up here so I can say, I told you so.


I have no reason to believe the demonstrations are violent. Some disturbed people are setting buildings on fire and shooting guns, but even they appear to be avoiding hurting other people. The only violence appears to be aimed at demonstrators. I bet, when this is all over, all the dead people will be black, and almost everyone who was injured will also be black.

Scott Talks to Anarchist Keith Preseton

This note refers to a comment left on a post by Keith Preston. His Facebook states he teaches sociology at John Tyler Community College – Midlothian Campus. His account on FB features pro-gun ownership symbols and other things usually associated with the extreme right-wing of American politics. His Facebook ‘friends’ include conspiracy theorist, Holocaust deniers, activists for the Ron Paul Revolution, and someone who identifies himself as a member of the “Confederate States Army”. Of the 4500 Facebook friends held by the dummy account I use to spy on conspiracy theorists, 510 of them are mutual friends with Keith.

Keith describes himself as an anarchist. He runs the blog, Attack the System. If I understand him correctly, Keith is seeking an anarchist synthesis of left and right wing. The reason for this is contained in his comment below.
http://attackthesystem.com/

I once accused Keith of harboring “a group of provincial homophobic White men” among his editors. He replied,

Well, our assortment of “provincial homophobic white men” includes among its leadership and contributors an African-American anarchist, an Arab-American, a native American, a gay gentleman who edits our queer affiliate site, a left-libertarian, a Hindu convert, a black Englishman, a Bangladeshi immigrant and others who don’t really fit the model you’re describing.

And while Keith would be technically correct, the “gay gentleman”, for example, identifies himself as a National Anarchist, which I will portray below as a largely anti-gay idea. So either this shows the great diversity being attracted to these ideas or that Keith has been able to surround himself with some very confused people. If you look at the crew he lists on this page

http://attackthesystem.com/statement-of-purpose/
one of the immediately obvious points is the heavy representation of National Anarchy. If it wasn’t for people from National Anarchy, he’d have almost no one. In fact, many of the people not listing an affiliation are also involved in National Anarchy. In a very real way, the success of Attack the System is predicated on its ability to attract people associated with National Anarchy.

National anarchy? Now that’s a mouthful. What is NA? There’s a lot written about NA, including the Great Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism
but basically, NA foresees a collapse of the current economic system and the emergence of autonomous village communities. It’s not necessarily right-wing, except its current adherents propose this could include communities that exclude different racial and ethnic groups. I haven’t read a lot about it but it seems to be tied to biological theories of human nature and a bunch of other quasi-scientific gobbly-gook about how current governments are evil because they make us do things we aren’t supposed to be doing. In a move that makes it look like NA is trying to be hip and trendy, some of their folk also support a free Tibet.

Prominent National Anarchist Troy Southgate, who appears on Keith’s website, believes that homosexuality is “unnatural” and hence will be excluded from this future of humanity.

Questionable aspects of Keith’s crew abound.
Michael Strasser is a Holocaust denier
Craig Fitzgerald is a member of the John Birch Society and a prominent name in the 9/11 conspiracy group We Are Change.
His wife is Jamie O’Hara.
Troy Southgate is a former member of the British National Front.
Michael C. is affiliated with the Confederacy apologist group the Southern Nationalist Network, although I have to admit, reading the group’s website made me aware of the idea that the South of the USA could be labeled a post-colonial society.

Anyway, here’s Keith’s comment,

I think our core documents, the statement of purpose, the 25 point program, and the podcasts have outlined the philosophy, analysis, strategy, and objectives of ARV-ATS as thoroughly and clearly as anyone could reasonably expect. The core idea we promote is attacking the state and state-allied institutions by decentralizing political and economic power down to the regional, municipal, village, neighborhood, and individual level to the greatest degree possible. Most of the rest of what we do is about strategy and tactics towards that objective.

And, yes, we try to promote this idea to as many different kinds of population or political groups as possible including the entire spectrum of opinion on other issues. That includes Randian businessmen and anarcho-syndicalists, middle America types and outlandish counterculturalists, far right racialists and inner city black street gangs, native American tribes and evangelical Christians, eco-terrorists and gun nuts, vegans and survivalists, et. al. ad nauseum. The majority of our senior editors and contributors including myself, Jeremy, RJ, Vince, and Miles are or have their roots on the Left.

This is a movement for anyone who advocates the radical decentralization of power, for whatever reason and regardless of what their views on other issues are. This is part of the necessary process of anti-state coalition building. I don’t know anything about your personal views, Scott, but our critics from the Left almost 100% percent of the time regurgitate the same basic point: They don’t want anything to do with us because we recognize that an effective anti-state movement must include everyone with grievances against the state and who regards themselves as having something to gain from the decentralization of power. Instead, leftists want to add on all sorts of litmus tests regarding other issues, particularly social and cultural issues like those involving the usual laundry list of Isms, Archies, and Phobias that leftists criticize. To that I say, no, that has the effect of weakening and dividing the broader anti-state movement. Plus, it allows for easier co-optation by the system. And it’s not necessary. There can be secondary organizations that address other issues outside the core struggle for decentralization.

I agree that there are certainly leftists who are exceptions, but as a general rule the contemporary left is more of a cultural movement than a political one. Almost to a person, what I have found is that leftists could not care less about overthrowing the system. Instead, what they’re concerned about is making sure no one ever expresses bigotry along taboo lines, promoting same-sex marriage and advancing the sexual revolution generally, therapeutic values (“my parents didn’t love me enough”) and essentially using politics as a form of group therapy, falling over themselves to the point of self-parody to show how inclusive or non-racist they are, lifestyle issues like vegetarianism, narrow self-interest issues like crying about student loan debts, etc. All of that is fine if that’s what they’re into but it’s hardly going to bring down the state. If anything, I’ve noticed these people often have a strong fear of political upheaval (“destabilization will bring fascism!!!”) and have in many ways become cautious conservatives. They regard the real enemy not as the state or even the corporate class but church-going Middle Americans or poor uneducated, rural white southerners. They don’t seem particularly concerned about even the police state so long as it stays out of their sex lives and lets them have all the abortions they want.

The general attitude I’ve gotten from leftists is “I don’t want anything to do with fighting the state if it means ever having to sit next to those icky un-PC folks!” which basically means anyone outside their own narrow subculture. What exactly are we supposed to do to appeal to people like that? And why should we even bother?